(O&M) Sanjiv Kumar v. Pb. Wakf Board And ORS.

2023:PHHC:071997

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R No. 6443 of 2006 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 10.05.2023 Sanjiv Kumar

...Petitioner

Versus

Punjab Wakf Board and others

...Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present :

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Jugansh Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate, For respondent No.1.

Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Divyansh Vats, Advocate for Mr. Naresh Kumar Bansal, Advocate, For respondents No.2 to 7.

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Matter was taken up for hearing on 15.03.2023, when learned counsel for respondent No-1/Board sought time to get instructions if anything survives for adjudication in instant appeal. On resumed hearing today, learned counsel for respondent No.1 states that during the pendency of instant revision petition, property in question has been allotted to respondents No.2 to 8, who have also been handed over the possession of same. He further informs that allotment made in favour of new allottees i.e respondents No.2 to 8 has not been challenged by the petitioner. On the other hand, none appears on behalf of petitioner.

SHALINI BHATIA 2023.05.24 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/ judgment

C.R No. 6443 of 2006 (O&M) -2Be that as it may, in view of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for respondent No.1, instant revision petition seems to have rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. May 10, 2023 (ARUN MONGA) Shalini JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No SHALINI BHATIA 2023.05.24 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/ judgment