Surat Singh v. Ramanand And ANR.

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.02.04 13:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-6716-2015 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CR-6716-2015 (O&M) Date of decision : 31.01.2019 Surat Singh ... Petitioner

Versus

Ramanand and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. H.R. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.2.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) In pursuance to the order dated 23.01.2019, the petitionerjudgment debtor has brought the entire amount along with interest 12% per annum, from the date of deposit till date i.e. `14,60,000/-, which has been handed over to Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, learned counsel representing respondent No.2, in cash, as a custodian of his client. In view of above, the execution application filed by the decree holder stands satisfied and therefore, no cause of action survives in the present revision petition, hence, the same is disposed of as such. The amount deposited by the auction purchaser is ordered to be refunded to the petitioner-judgment debtor in accordance with law. 31.01.2019 Yogesh Sharma ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No