Jagjit Singh Gill v. Kartar Singh & ORS

C.R. No. 6780 of 2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 6780 of 2015 Date of decision:- 12.10.2015 Jagjit Singh Gill

...Petitioner

Versus

Kartar Singh & others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Divanshu Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.

RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Petitioner has filed the instant revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing order dated 28.04.2015 (P-3) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Chandigarh whereby evidence of the petitioner has been closed.

A perusal of the zimini orders shows that that it was learned counsel for the defendants who had sought adjournments time and again and only on few occasions, learned counsel for the plaintiff/petitioner sought an adjournment. The matter was being adjourned time and again for compromising the matter between the parties. So, the observation of the learned Court below that the petitioner had taken 16 effective opportunities to conclude its evidence deserves to be set aside. In view of the above, order dated 28.04.2015 (P-3) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Chandigarh is hereby set aside and the GAURAV ARORA 2015.10.16 12:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

C.R. No. 6780 of 2015 -2instant revision petition is allowed and the trial Court is directed to give two effective opportunities to the petitioner to conclude its evidence, subject to payment of Rs.5000/- as cost to be deposited before the District State Legal Services Authority, Chandigarh.

October 12, 2015 ( RITU BAHRI ) G Arora JUDGE GAURAV ARORA 2015.10.16 12:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document