Roshan Lal v. Mamraj And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.6802 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision.18.01.2016 Roshan lal ......Petitioner Vs.

Mam Raj and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Balkar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The counsel for the petitioner states that the main suit itself has been reported to be disposed of and the civil revision has become infructuous.

2.

The revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 18, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.01.19 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document