Anil Gupta v. Tarun Sadana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-5137-2020 Date of Decision: 02.08.2022 Anil Gupta ......... Petitioner
Versus
Tarun Sadana ......... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Sukhdeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. A.D.S Sukhija, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Charanjit Bakshi, Addl. P.P., U.T.
Mr. R.S. Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhananjay Mittal for the complainant.
**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the parties submits that the matter has been rendered infructuous because the complaint has been withdrawn. Given above, the present petition disposed of having been rendered infructuous. All interim orders stand withdrawn. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 02.08.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2022.08.03 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document