Mini Kumari v. Punjab And Haryana High Court Of Chandigarh And Another


  
   !"#"$"%"""
"$ "

$ $&'&(     &&)*+,&


 &+'1&$1&+
34

*,25&01
6 6 "+&#1,&
47 3 )&,0& 

 

7 7 -, 4 ,9&,5&01 
6  8 !/&51,+
3 7

+
778

*,9: *,9-

 *-.,/&01
*,
1&0,11,'
74  )&; *-.,/&01
*,
1&0,11,'
78   <=&)*+, '2' "$
7 

&;$9& &01
*, *-.,/
1&0,11, '2'
"(>?#< 5!

5
<5" <<





 


  

  !

"#

 $
%
 


  



!

"#

&
'
 


(

)(
 


  



*+

"#

,
)(
 


,$

 


  



-"


+.

"#

 6



 


  



.


"#

/ '

,
 


  
 0"

"#

 

 


,
/$
 


  

 -"


"#

  )$1
 


  

 *".

"#

2 

 


  

 ..0

"#

  3,4
 


  

 .0

"#

5

$(

 
1 

6$
 


  

 .!


"#



$ 
 


 (
&
 




 ..0

.+

"#

(
  
 


1$
78$
 


  99999
<5" <<@!,=
)

$$


   !

! 

*+

-"

+.

.


0"
-"


*".
..0
.+
.0

.!


$$

1
  

4
$
48
 





$
 6

1
$ 
1
 

 ,
 
!

"*

"+
:
;

  
4, 

$ 




$,6

4
$64$


,
)
 
1
& 


6

;4,



 

4 <


 $
= 
 $
=$ 

 3
66
,

1
  
1
$
1 

8



1


 

 

=6
$
 
"+

"0
:
;



48




148
 


  

4
& 
1 

 
 


 



  
 





$
 6   
1
, 

(

:, 
$$8



48

26


 
1
   5





 
+ "0



  +0

"
  

1
  
1 
1
$$

1
  
1
66



4
 

$




 ;

>In the meantime, respondent No.2 shall file a short affidavit giving the details as to which of the petitioners would make merit since result of only 21 persons has been declared. The affidavit will also give the details as to how many out of the said 21 persons joined on the said post and how many posts are thus still vacant. The said exercise would be necessary as it would facilitate as to which of the petitioners would still be liable for consideration against the vacancies."

?
,$


 
!



4
$
$6
1 
,
1
$

 
1

,, 
4$

,4$
, (
  
 8
-"#

1
6<  

$

"

"

"

"





$
 6

3
$


 
4,





 
  

$$

1
  


4
$

$ 
 



1
  



 7
 
3
$


  

4$

8

,

8
& 


6
 $
, :
1$
4
$8
,

$$


1
  

6$8



 
?

$




:





6

4



1
  

A<5" <<B

       !*0 ';1

 
(6<

%<

 
 4$

%<