Shankar Lal v. State Of Punjab







 

 

  











  



!"!

#$
%&&
 '

( (



  
)




 *$
+ (
* &

&&
 , (&
----
 




  

(Amicus Curiae)


 
Mr. Hardeep Hans, AAG, Punjab.
&&
 , (.
&
/ (0

 
!"

#$%
 


 
 
&'()&(('

!"




*$
+$$


,
-&(

&.(/&((/
 

0  
$
1
2

 3

$

4
-.
 
(5(6&((/
$

/()7/)

4,
 

 
 

 1 
8 
 1  &
The case of the prosecution is that on 04.01.2003 at about 2.00/2.30 p.m. in the area of Sujanpur Tempu Stand, the appellant in furtherance of common intention with his co-accused committed culpable homicide not amounting to murder by intentionally causing the death of Kannu. After recording the statement of complainant, the abovementioned FIR was registered on &.(/&((/ against the appellant and his co-accused. The appellant alongwith his co-accused was arrested in the present case, and after completion of formal

 

investigation, the challan was prepared and presented before the Court for commencement of trial. Pursuant thereto, the appellant alongwith his co-accused was tried in the Court and vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated &'()&((' passed by the then Addl. Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur, the appellant was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default thereof, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months under Section 304 of IPC. /

2
$



 






%$
#$%
 
 
&'()&(('

% 
!$
  

"
9$
%  




9$ $%
 
 
 




"
$
!"

 



"
$



(.

"
66
% 

&:
"
 $
%

 $


(5
"
66
% 

&
"
$


 
  

('
"
;
$ 
"

 
4

9$ 
 


"
&((/
 



%"
!
1





9$ $%
!"

,$ 
)

<

 


 
$


"
 
!"
"
 
 $ "
   



 
('(6&(&.

$!% 



,$



=
#$%
!


  
  
 !

 
; 



 $ 







  

"
 
 5

4
 


$


 

 

$

% 
 

  .

>


!


%% 
$!
% 

%$ 

%$
!"
$
 


 
%"
?$

$!
$

/()

4,,

 

%%$%
$%

!
 !
$ %

4




 


"
&((/




"





 $ 

%


  '

;3!

$%
,$

@     

 !

"

#$ % 

&%





  



%

% "

%

A

%%$%

%B%$%
%

 !
!"

  $ 
 




 

  "
%


 


,$ 
 1$

 

 
 $

1
  "




 

%

 



 

%% 





$
$
!


 %

9$ $%

  


  



!
$
! "

% "
 


 



  
$
!

!

%

 
   "

$


  

 
B  "




%
 

  C

$ 

=*$
 


;D!
$%
,$

' (   

!

)

% 





% 
 

 

 
$


 


 
!"
%1



$
E

%
$

"


%
!$



  "


>






 

 $ 


 % 
%$
!
 

$ 
  


!
B 
!"
 $ 

 
 $%  

 

!"
  

 $
 %

%

 

%

%% 

$




$

 1

#


! 
! 



"




 

 % 


$ :


$


%$
#$%
 

!"



,$
  

  "

 



%

!


  

  
 !

 
; 


$







#$%
 

% 
 
  

"
"


%  




9$ $%
 




  
"
$
!"

  6(





9$ 

9$ $%
 




 

 




$ 



 


"
&((/



"

B $





%
$!


 




$
$ 
$

,  $ 

4
>


"
$



"

  
7 $ 

 



%


 


!





,$




;
%
   

(.
"
66
% 

&:
"
 $
%
;

!
 
 $"



B% "
&&
"



 "



!
  
4




 
! 





 $ "
$
!"

 


 

!

 
 "
>


 

! 
  

1
!"

,$



>$
$
!"

#$ 
$ % 
%
!"

;D!
$%
,$




*+    

,

- 

"..

$ .



% 

   /0    

//   

"

 $



#





 $%  
 

  $



&

  "






 





$
% 
"

,$

 



#$  
$
$

 "
!
% 
 
%
$



$ 



"
$
!"
%
66



"

#$%
 
 
&'()&(('

!"





*$
+$$

$ 


%
!"

,$ 
 



  
 
 
is modified and the sentence of the appellant is reduced to the period of sentence "
$
!"
%

 
 
$
!
$



#$  !

 

 

#$  
>



!
;



$
;
!7$ "
!

 
; 


!

%  


"%
 
%
!"


,$ 
>


 



%$
 
! 


,$ 78$ "
  7,
*$ 
  
+$$
 




% 
%
"

 


!
!

!
1
 
$ "

$
%%



 $
$

!"


,$

 
#$%
 
&'()&((' 6&
A 

%  


  


  6/

  FG

"


 

 
6)
>
,
*$ 
  
+$$

 

  
 
 


 


%$
 


 
 

 $ 
%
/&&
 , (0




%.
&



















 
1