Sunita Yadav And ANR v. U.T.Chandigarh And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH.
Date of Decision:
....Petitioners
VERSUS
....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH ! " #$$ Mr. Y. S. Rathore, APP, U.T., Chandigarh (through Video Conferencing).
******* KARAMJIT SINGH, J.(Oral) 1.
Petitioners allege that both of them are major and they got married on 19.01.2025 against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 7 who are related to both the petitioners. This is their first marriage. 2.
Counsel for the petitioners submits that aforesaid private respondents No.4 to 7 have threatened to cause harm to both the petitioners and in this regard, representation dated 20.01.2025 (Annexure P-5) was given to Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh but till date no action has been taken by the concerned authority in this regard. 3.
Notice of motion.
Priyanka Thakur 2025.01.24 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
% 4.
Mr. Y. S. Rathore, APP, U.T., Chandigarhaccepts notice on behalf of U.T. Chandigarh. He submits that the concerned authority will look into the matter and take decision on the representation of the petitioners in accordance with law.
5.
In view of above, without going into the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with direction to Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh to consider representation dated 20.01.2025 (Annexure P-5) and to take action if so warranted in accordance with law. 6.
However, any observations made in this order will not be construed as an expression of opinion on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. In case the petitioners have committed any offence, law will take its own course.
(KARAMJIT SINGH) JUDGE
Priyanka Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Priyanka Thakur 2025.01.24 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document