Joginder Singh v. Jagminder Singh

CR No.697 of 2018 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CR No.697 of 2018 Date of decision:05.02.2018 Joginder Singh ... Petitioner Vs.

Jagminder Singh ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) The petitioner-defendant is aggrieved of the order dated 11.01.2018 (Annexure P-4), whereby, evidence of the defendant has been closed.

Mr. Parminder Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case, one opportunity is granted, the petitioner will conclude the entire evidence subject to any terms and conditions which this Court deem fit.

I have heard the counsel for the petitioner-defendant, appraised the paper book and of the view that no doubt, the petitioner-defendant was negligent in concluding the evidence, however, in order to advance justice and prevent miscarriage of justice, I deem it appropriate to grant one effective opportunity to the petitioner to conclude the evidence. Savita 2018.02.07 13:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CR No.697 of 2018 {2} Keeping in view the aforementioned observations, the impugned order is set aside and the petitioner-defendant shall conclude the evidence in accordance with law subject to payment of costs of `5,000/- which shall be condition precedent. If the costs is not paid as directed, the order passed already by the court below shall stand restored. The impugned order is set aside and the revision petition is allowed dispensing with notice to the respondent in order to save time of the Court and defray the expenses of litigation of respondent. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE February 05, 2018 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2018.02.07 13:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh