Parveen Dhiman v. Nidhi Kukal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CR No. 7404 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.11.2016 Parveen Dhiman ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

Nidhi Kukal ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Briz Mohan, Advocate for Mr. Simranjeet S. Sarwara, Advocate for the petitioner.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ejectment order against the revision-petitioner has already been passed by learned Rent Controller and the remedy available to revision-petitioner is to file appeal against that order, as such, this revision-petition has been rendered infructuous.

In view of submission of learned counsel for revisionpetitioner, the instant revision-petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) November 07, 2016.

JUDGE jk Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2016.11.08 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document