Sarabjit Singh @ Sabhi v. State Of Punjab And ANR

        
 



 !

"#$#%&
'

('

  ) *'

# #% + , +$-$ '

'''' $.%!

% $ /& 01/'  , 

  










 


 
 
!
"#

$  ,2'314 % 



&

#

#'
 


&&
  
 "
"

() (( )*)+

#'
&
& 
,"
,& 

- 
 
 '
#&

 


&&


#
 &

./


"  ' 

!

 "

#%$ 5#"



#% *2 *3 )*)+ ((04)5
((14(5
666
60(4)5 7(4)5
8 8" &
 ,&  2.

Heard.

3.

Learned counsel for the appellant contends that appellant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He contends that vide order dated 11.03.2025, the appellant had been directed to join investigation and was granted interim bail. He submits that in pursuance to the aforesaid order, the appellant has joined the investigation.


 4.

Learned State counsel intimates the Court that the appellant has joined the investigation and is neither required for further investigation nor for any custodial interrogation.

5.

During the course of hearing on 11.03.2025, following order was passed: - 







                 

       

     

 

  

   

                    

   

              !!"#$ %&'&()

 '* *#+, -) & ( -

   .

  



  

   



   

    



.

            

     

     /

 



 

  

0

/



0

    

 )

(%+,  -)) & 1 



0

        .

  2     *  &&(&14 6.

After considering the rival contentions and perusing the record, it transpires that the appellant has been implicated in the instant FIR for having committed offence punishable under 
((04)5 ((14(5
666960(4)5
7(4)5
8. At the same time, it is not disputed that the appellant, after having been directed vide order dated 11.03.2025, has joined the investigation. As per learned State counsel, he is not required for

6 further investigation nor he is required for custodial interrogation of the case. This be the case, the interim bail granted to the appellant vide order dated 11.03.2025 is hereby confirmed subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. The appellant is directed to join investigation as and when required in future also by way of a written notice for such purpose to be served by Investigating Officer of this case; he will not tamper with the evidence nor will influence the witnesses and will not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. 7.

With these observations, the impugned judgment dated 12.11 )*)+, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, is set aside and the instant appeal stands allowed.




&45

'
&

 


 3 ,4 *) *+ )*)0

 

" 5 :

 
 9;

<98 5 :

 
 #&;

<98