Raj Dulari v. State Of Haryana And Others

2024:PHHC:017508 CWP-1766-2024 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1766-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.02.2024 Raj Dulari

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. AG, Haryana Mr. Naveen S. Bhardwarj. Advocate for respondents no.2 to 4 *** TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to implement the orders dated 27.06.2017, Annexure P-5, and 29.06.2017, Annexure P-6, passed by respondents no.1 and 3 respectively.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a comprehensive representation before respondent no.3/Registrar, seeking notional promotion and due financial benefits.

3.

Learned counsel for respondents no.2 to 4, appearing on advance notice, submits that in case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously. PAYAL 2024.02.09 15:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

2024:PHHC:017508 CWP-1766-2024 (O&M) -24.

In view thereof, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a comprehensive representation before respondent No.3 within a period of one week from today. In case any such representation is filed, the same shall decided by respondent No.3/Registrar, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receiving the representation. 5.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 08.02.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2024.02.09 15:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment