Deepak v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M No. 3864 of 2020 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRM-M No. 3864 of 2020 Date of Decision: 04.2.2020 Deepak ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Present:

Mr. R.K.Lathwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rahul Mohan, DAG, Haryana.

**** HARNARESH SINGH GILL , J. (ORAL) The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No. 258 dated 15.7.2019 under Sections 307, 506, 34 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Civil Line, District Sonipat. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been attributed two injuries i.e. one on the hand of the complainant and the other on the ankle of Chander. He further submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.7.2019 and till date no prosecution witness has been examined.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Narender, submits that in the present case charge was framed on 19.10.2019 and out of 22 prosecution witnesses, none has been examined. The petitioner has been in custody since 18.7.2019. Out of 22 prosecution witnesses, none has been examined yet. The trial will take time GURPREET SINGH 2020.02.04 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh to conclude. No useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner

CRM-M No. 3864 of 2020 -2behind the bars.

Without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

(HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE February 04, 2020 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No GURPREET SINGH 2020.02.04 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh