High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/4196/2026disposed of

Sukhjit Singh Alias Bablu And Others v. State Of Punjab And Another

2026-05-26Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-4196-2026 Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 SUKHJIT SINGH ALIAS BABLU AND OTHERS ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI

Present:

Mr. Nitin Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab.

**** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the petition under Section 528 of BNSS is for quashing of FIR No. 110 dated 14.11.2024, under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 191(3), 190 and 238 of the BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Lohian, District Jalandhar Rural and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 19.12.2025 (Annexure P-2). Vide order dated 28.01.2026 this Court had directed the parties to appear before Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded in terms of certain parameters given in the aforesaid order dated 28.01.2026 with regard to the compromise (Annexure P-2). In terms of the orders dated 28.01.2026 passed by this Court parties have appeared before the court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Nakodar and as per the report dated 16.05.2026 submitted to this Court, both the parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court. VISHAL SETHI 2026.05.28 13:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-4196-2026 -2A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a remote possibility of the complainant coming forward to support the prosecution case. The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised in such like situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused. The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the direction issued by the Court in Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543.

In view of the aforesaid report of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Nakodar, accompanied by the joint statement of both the parties, the present FIR No. 110 dated 14.11.2024, under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 191(3), 190 and 238 of the BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Lohian, District Jalandhar Rural and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners herein. Petition stands disposed of.

(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE May 26, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No VISHAL SETHI 2026.05.28 13:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document