Vijay Kumar v. Mahesh Setia & ANR
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH Date of decision: - 09.08.2021 Vijay Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus
Mahesh Setia and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Ms. Divanshu Jain, Advocate for the applicants-respondents.
Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate for the non-applicant/petitioner.
(keeping in view the advance copy given).
( Through Video Conferencing ) **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) CM-6640-CII-2021 Present application has been filed for preponing the date of hearing of the main revision petition i.e. CR-7283-2018, which now stands adjourned to 02.11.2021 as according to the applicantsrespondents the same has been rendered infructuous in view of the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties. Notice of the application to the counsel opposite. Mr. Hemant Bassi, who has joined the proceedings through
-2video conference, keeping in view the service of advance copy of application, the accepts notice on behalf of the non-applicant/petitioner. Learned counsel for the non-applicant/petitioner raises no objection for preponement of hearing of main revision petition i.e. CR-7283-2018, as being prayed by the applicants-respondents. In view of the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, the present application is allowed and the hearing of main revision petition i.e. CR-7283-2018 is preponed from 02.11.2021 to today. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the parties have amicably settled their disputes by way of compromise/affidavit dated 09.06.2020, a copy of which has been attached along with CM-6640-CII2021 as Annexure R-A.
Learned counsel for the respondents further submits that the petitioner has already given the possession of the land in question to the respondents and therefore, the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he does not have any instructions from the petitioner, but as the respondents has attached an affidavit of the petitioner as Annexure R-A, which prima facie shows the settlement between the parties, he has no objection in case the present petition is disposed of keeping in view of the statement being made by the learned counsel for the respondents regarding the settlement between the parties.
-3Keeping in view the above, as submitted by counsel for the respondents, the disputes between the parties have been settled and the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and accordingly, the same is disposed of as such.
( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) August 09, 2021 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?
Yes Whether reportable?
No