Aziz Ahmad v. Additional District Registrar (Birht & Death) And ANR

CR No.7405 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.7405 of 2017 Date of decision :30.10.2017 Aziz Ahmad

...Petitioner

Versus

Additional District Registrar (Birth & Death) and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

Present:

Mr. Mohammad Arshad, Advocate for the petitioner.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. (Oral) Plaintiff is in revision petition against the order dated 06.08.2017, which is extracted as under:- "Reply to application under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, has been filed. Learned counsel for respondent has made the following statement:

" The respondent would not claim any benefit of his date of birth by virtue of the decree in his favour, in any Government department, Semi Government department/Undertaking/Corporation etc. and he would confine his relief only for the change in name."

Learned counsel for appellant No.1 and learned Government Pleader, for respondent No.2, have made the following statement:

Sheetal 2017.11.09 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CR No.7405 of 2017 -2- " In view of the statement made by Shri Abdul Gaffar, Advocate for respondentplaintiff today, we withdraw the appeal." In view of the above said joint statement of learned Government Pleader and Shri J.S. Saini, Advocate, for appellants, in view of the statement learned counsel for the respondent, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Needless to say that the respondent-plaintiff would be bound by the statement recorded herein. A copy of this order along with lower Court record be sent back. File be consigned to record room after due compliance.""

The order is on the basis of statement made by the respective counsels. Petitioner claims that he has never given instructions to his counsel to make such statement. It would be proper if the petitioner moves the very Court for bringing his grievance to the notice of the Court. Proceedings recorded in the Court are always considered to be reflection of what has happened in the Court. If the petitioner has any grievance, he would be at liberty to move an application before the same Court. Revision petiton is disposed of.

30.10.2017 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned: No Whether Reportable : No Sheetal 2017.11.09 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document