Rachhpal Singh & ANR v. Karamjit Kaur & ORS

CR No.7770 of 2016 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CR No.7770 of 2016 Date of decision:22.11.2016 Rachhpal Singh and another ... Petitioners Vs.

Smt. Karamjit Kaur and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Mr. Alok Mittal, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that caveator/plaintiffs are aggrieved of the pendency of the appeal bearing No.54 dated 01.06.2013 filed against the judgment and decree dated 17.05.2013 passed by the then Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Derabassi in civil Suit No.130 of 2005/2008, vide which the suit for possession by way of specific performance and injunction, has been decreed. In this regard, zimni orders, Annexure P-4, (from page 124 to 159) have been placed on record to indicate the factum of pendency of the appeal.

I am of the view that the appeal against the judgment and decree cannot be kept pending adjudication for a period of three years and most of the miscellaneous applications are with regard to bringing on record the LRs, nothing beyond.

Savita 2016.11.29 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CR No.7770 of 2016 {2} The present revision petition is disposed of with an appropriate direction to the concerned Court, i.e., Additional District Judge, Mohali to decide the aforementioned appeal, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

With the aforementioned observations, revision petition stands disposed of.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE November 22, 2016 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2016.11.29 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh