Sandeep Nanawati v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M No.5720 of 2021 ...1...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.5720 of 2021 Date of Decision: 10th February, 2022.

Sandeep Nanawati

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. H.S. Oberoi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. C.L.Pawar, Senior DAG, Punjab.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) The petitioner herein has sought the relief of anticipatory bail in the criminal case arising out of the FIR bearing No.43 dated 09.03.2020 registered at Police Station Raman District Bathinda, under Section 420 IPC.

Learned State counsel, on the instructions from ASI Gurjant Singh from the above-said Police Station, apprises the Court that in compliance of the order dated 09.02.2021 as passed by the Co-ordinate Bench, the petitioner has joined in the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required and he is also not involved in any other criminal case of the similar nature.

In view of the afore-discussed submission as made by learned State counsel, the instant petition is allowed and the relief of interim bail, as SEEMA SHARMA 2022.02.10 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M No.5720 of 2021 ...2...

extended to the petitioner named Sandeep Nanawati by the Co-ordinate Bench vide the said order dated 09.02.2021, is hereby made absolute. However, the petitioner shall continue to join in the investigation as and when required/called upon to do so and shall also strictly abide by all the conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 10.02.2022.

seema Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes Whether Reportable?

No SEEMA SHARMA 2022.02.10 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document