High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/7847/2016dismissed

Satish Kumar v. Amar Singh

2016-12-02Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CR-7847-2016 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Civil Revision No.7847 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 02, 2016.

Satish Kumar ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

Amar Singh ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Sunil Garg, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. D.K. Bhatti, Advocate for the respondent (s).

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner under the instructions from the revision petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with prayer that petitioner be allowed reasonable time for vacating and handing over the possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlord. Mr. D.K. Bhatti, Advocate for the respondent-landlord agrees with the proposal as put forth by learned counsel for the petitioner to the extent that the respondent has no objection in allowing time upto 30th September, 2017 to the revision petitioner to vacate the demised premises.

In view of request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, Sachin Mehta 2016.12.12 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CR-7847-2016 -2this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The revision petitioner is allowed period upto 30.09.2017 to vacate the demised premises, subject to the following terms:- (i) The petitioner-tenant will pay/deposit the entire due rent upto 31st December, 2016 within four weeks.

(ii) He will keep on paying/depositing the advance rent/mesne profits of subsequent months upto 30.09.2017 on or before 7th day of each month.

(iii) He will file affidavit before the executing Court within six weeks giving details of entire payment of rent/mesne profits and undertaking to vacate and hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlord on or before 30.09.2017. In case of default of any of the above terms, the respondentlandlord will be entitled to execute the order of ejectment forthwith. ( SURINDER GUPTA ) December 02, 2016.

JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2016.12.12 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH