State Of Haryana v. Roshan Lal
! "
#$#%&#'!()
* %!(!+(,#'!()
*
* -.-#!/.%0.(. 11#22.(- 3#%$+$ !$4.(5.2 #$1!('#(- ) 6 5 78
789 The present appeal is directed against the judgment of acquittal dated 15.02.2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jhajjar, whereby the accused-respondent was acquitted of the charge under Section 408 IPC. !
"
# %&'
) * +,%- '
+,%- * !! ' .
! + * !! 01 23 2456
( +,%- '
# !
02 10 2443 ' 512 57
(
' 86611 57
' 51740 08
12 17 2443 39 16 2443 , 3893 23896 23863 23756
' 57301 80
12 17 2443 39 16 2443
' 3721 61
' 81793 85
02 10 2443 : ' 0156 49
: ' 3470 05
' 270 98 :
' 81946 09
' .
;/
< #
39 16 2443
%&'
#
= (
#
19 22 2443 (
#
(
32 17 2440
#
#
&
"
*
: (
: >"2 #
,# $
+ 25 19 2440
:
# -: >2/
":
-: >2/
( #?
@
" +,%- : >"3
33 19 2443
' 70067/"
-: >3/
(
":
(
) * +,%- : >"0
19 22 2443 '
#"
* !!
' 81946/"
+,%-
%&'
(
":
#"
(
#"
+,%- : >"7
"
'#
") : >"9
(
# ! A
( ( +,%-
":
( (
+,%-
( #BB
>"6
'
+,%- >"8
-: >8/
-: >8/&
(
":
-: >8/ -: >8/& (
#
#
#
( . : >"5
%&'
-:
#
(
#
:
= !
30 10 3112 39 10 3112 * 2 * !!
"
&
'& ' 3111/"
!
?
!
?
#
.
(
(
- >"2 #
,# $ @
") +,%- * !!
>"8 '
+,%-
# ( ?
#
#
#
(
#
& #
- !
#
(
#
"
!
# ( ( C#
?
!
&
#
C#
!/.4.'#!5.;.<.(3$ -.-#!/.4.%.$-%. 3118;0< ''
; <
?
?
(
( # #
(
?
C#
.4=('#% %.-.1=(>43$ -.-#!/ ;22<
("
!
"
#
$ % & '
(
)* +) +*,) ( ' - +*,+ .* )/ .))0 .1
)
( # (
( (
#
#
(
+ (
#
# ?
-: >0/
&
/ (
' 51740 08 (
( 12 17 2443 39 16 2443 ' 57380 80 (
@
33 19 2443 ( >"3 @
(
' 70067/" -: >0/
' 81946 09
%
) *
+,%-
( - >"9 '#
#
% >"8
( (
(
(
>"2 #
,# $
-: >2/ -: >2/
- >2 #
,# $
#
-: >2/
(
# # #
( #
#
?
!udgment of acquittal dated 15.02.2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jhajjar #
;< #
:
( $ # #
# (N.S. SHEKHAWAT) 28.03.2023 JUDGE mks >
/' E-
/ ,+ > '# E-
/ ,+