Balraj v. Ravinder Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No. 138 CR-7975-2015 Date of Decision: 27.01.2025 ....Petitioner
Versus
.....Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- None for the petitioner.
Mr. Rose Gupta, Advocate for the respondent.
***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) Case called twice. None has made appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
Perusal of the paperbook reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, for the last three consecutive dates. Precisely, on the basis of the same, vide order dated 20.09.2024, the interim relief earlier granted, was ordered to be discontinued. Despite the same, none had made appearance on the last date of hearing. Even today, none has made appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
Seemingly, the petitioner is not interested to pursue the revision petition. Hence, the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ARCHANA PURI) 27.01.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes Whether reportable :
Yes/No Sonu 2025.01.27 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC