Paramjit Kaur v. Seema Rani And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.770 of 2017 Date of Decision.10.01.2019 Paramjit Kaur
...Petitioner
Vs Seema Rani and others
...Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:
Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Kumar Saini, Advocate for the respondents.
-.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the revision petition against the interim order passed in pending suit has become infructuous, as the main suit itself has been withdrawn. In view of the statement made by the counsel for the respondents, the revision petition is dismissed as having become infrcutuous.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE January 10, 2019 Pankaj* Whether Reasoned/Speaking Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.01.14 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document