Pinki And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Crl.W.P.No.948 of 2023 Date of Decision:- 02.02.2023 Pinki and another ....Petitioners vs.

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents *** BEFORE :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL *** Present:- Mr. Ravi Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Harkanwarjit Singh, AAG, Punjab.

*** Sudhir Mittal, J. (Oral) The petitioners allege that they have performed their marriage against the wishes of their parents and thus, they fear for their lives and liberty. A representation dated 27.01.2023 (Annexure P-4) has been submitted to respondent No.2, but he has not taken any action thereupon. Notice of motion to respondents No. 1 to 3.

Mr. Himmat Singh, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice and waives service.

Considering the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to serve the private respondents or to seek a reply from any one of the respondents.

The petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take into consideration the request of the petitioners made vide representation dated 27.01.2023 (Annexure P-4) and to provide necessary protection in case the facts of the case so dictate. POONAM RATHORE 2023.02.02 15:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement

Crl.W.P.No.948 of 2023 -2It is made clear that this order is not a bar on initiation of any proceedings in accordance with law nor is it an expression of opinion regarding the validity or otherwise of the marriage. February 02, 2023 ( SUDHIR MITTAL) poonam JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No POONAM RATHORE 2023.02.02 15:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement