Irshad Aalam Alias Miya Ji v. State Of Haryana

106+222

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 5263 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.03.2022 Irshad Aalam @ Miya Ji .......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another .......... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Mayur Karkra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. **** SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL) CRMs-11962-64-2022 1.

The applications are allowed, as prayed for.

2.

Reply of respondent No. 2 is taken on record. 3.

Registry to place the same at an appropriate place in the paperbook, and, paginate accordingly. MAIN CASE 1.

After arguing for some time, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, seeks permission of the Court, to, withdraw the instant petition.

2.

Permission granted. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

March 30, 2022 ( SURESHWAR THAKUR ) 'dk kamra'

JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2022.03.31 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document