Harnam Singh & ANR v. Mool Chand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-8213-2016 Date of decision: 09.05.2018 Harnam Singh and another ..... Petitioners
Versus
Mool Chand ..... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Arun Kumar Singal, Advocate for the respondent. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Notice of motion.
Mr. Arun Kumar Singal, Advocate, who is present in Court accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and has filed Vakalatnama in Court today. The same is taken on record. Office to tag the same at the appropriate place.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the instant revision has rendered infructuous, in view of the fact that the draft sale deed was executed and registered through the assistance of Executing Court. In view of the above, the instant revision is dismissed as having rendered infructuous and also for want of prosecution. May 09, 2018 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Rishu Kataria 2018.05.11 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document