Balwinder Gir @ Gari @ Vijay v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-5639-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.07.2022 BALWINDER GIR @ GARI @ VIJAY




















STATE OF PUNJAB 
 



   

    
 

 




   
 



! 
  " ####    

 $  





 
"
  
" 
%
&'((

)*))'+')
  


''


',


&!


-))
%.



/
!    0 
  




"/


 

"
/


% 1



2



/
  1





 
"



/
 3







"





'4))'+') 5



"/

here is no other case registered and/or pending against the petitioner, at least of a similar nature. Per contra, while opposing the prayer for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, learned State counsel does not dispute the custody period of the petitioner and the fact that no recovery was effected from the petitioner. He, however, submits that post presentation of the challan, charge(s) is yet to be framed.

AMAN JAIN 2022.07.07 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-5639-2022 (O&M) -2I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has not been named in the FIR, who has been in custody since 23.11.2021. No recovery was effected from the petitioner. There is no other case registered and/or pending against the petitioner, at least of a similar nature. Charge(s) is yet to be framed and prosecution evidence is to commence. In such circumstances, the trial of the case would take a long time to conclude. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars. In view of the above and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, lest it should prejudice the case of either side, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned.    

   

 /
6     


    
    AMAN JAIN 2022.07.07 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment