Satish Kumar v. State Of Punjab And Others
CWP-1928-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1928-2024 Date of Decision: January 31, 2024 Satish Kumar ......Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present:
Mr.Ravish Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
........
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) Petitioner has approached this Court praying for issuance of direction to respondent No.6-Municipal Council Jaito to deliver possession of plot No.1, measuring 13' x 16' situated near Gurudwara Bhai Jagta Ji, Jaito, allotted to the petitioner in an open auction dated 11.06.2013 or to allot and deliver possession of any other alternative commercial site/plot of similar size. It is also prayed to issue direction to respondents No.1 to 6 to expeditiously consider and decide the representation, dated 08.11.2023, Annexure P-9.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would be satisfied if his representation, dated 08.11.2023, Annexure P-9, is decided in a time-bound manner.
Notice of motion.
On asking of the Court, Ms.Akshita Chauhan, DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State. Mr.Vikram Preet Aneja, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of MEENU 2024.02.02 12:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-1928-2024 -2respondent No.6 and submits that representation of the petitioner would be decided expeditiously.
Heard.
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.6, i.e. Executive Officer, Municipal Council Jaito, District Faridkot, to look into the representation, dated 08.11.2023, Annexure P-9, and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law preferably within four weeks from today.
January 31, 2024 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.
Whether speaking/reasoned ?
Yes/No 2.
Whether reportable ?
Yes/No MEENU 2024.02.02 12:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document