Tarsem Chand v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M No. 4259 of 2020 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRM-M No. 4259 of 2020 Date of Decision: 24.3.2021 Tarsem Chand ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Present:

Mr. Sherry K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Kumar, DAG, Punjab.

**** HARNARESH SINGH GILL , J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 03 dated 10.1.2020, registered under Sections 22 and 29 (added later on) of NDPS Act, 1985, Police Station Maur, District Bathinda.

Vide order dated 31.1.2020, passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the petitioner was granted interim bail and was directed to join the investigation.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the said order dated 31.1.2020, the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Sadhu Singh, submits that the petitioner has joined investigation and is not required for any further investigation.

In view of the above facts, but without commenting on the GURPREET SINGH 2021.03.24 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh

CRM-M No. 4259 of 2020 -2merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 31.1.2020 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE March 24, 2021 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No GURPREET SINGH 2021.03.24 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh