Darshan Singh v. Pritam Singh

YOGESH SHARMA 2018.11.28 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-7964-2018 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CR-7964-2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 26.11.2018 Darshan Singh ... Petitioner

Versus

Pritam Singh ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. L.M. Gulati, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J.

The petitioner-plaintiff is aggrieved of the order dated 17.10.2018, whereby, his evidence has been closed by order. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner-plaintiff submits that in case, one opportunity is granted, he will conclude the evidence.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff and appraised the paper book and of the view that no doubt, the petitionerplaintiff was negligent in concluding the evidence. However, in order to advance justice and prevent miscarriage of justice, I deem it appropriate to grant one opportunity (effective) to conclude evidence. I do not intend to issue the notice to the respondent to defray the cost of litigation, much less, wastage of time. Keeping in view the aforementioned observations, the

YOGESH SHARMA 2018.11.28 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-7964-2018 (O&M) impugned order is set aside and the petitioner-plaintiff shall conclude the evidence, in accordance with law, subject to payment of costs of `5,000/- which shall be condition precedent.

Accordingly, the present revision petition stands allowed. 26.11.2018 Yogesh Sharma ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE  Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No  Whether Reportable Yes/ No