Amit Rao v. Tarif

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (109) CR-805-2017(O&M) Date of decision:- 18.02.2025 Amit Rao

...Petitioner

Versus

Tarif

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: None for the petitioner.

...

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) 1.

On 22.02.2017, this Court passed the following order:- "Learned counsel prays for some time to place on record certain documents. Prayer is accepted.

Learned counsel may address on the question of maintainability of the revision petition against the final order passed by the authority under the Workmen's Compensation Act. Be listed as and when appropriate application is moved." 2.

Despite lapse of five years, petitioner has not filed any application and there is no representation on his behalf. 3.

It seems that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. 4.

Dismissed for default in prosecution.

(SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 18.02.2025 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.02.19 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.