Ram Phal v. Radhe Shyam

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.8689 of 2015 Date of Decision.15.07.2016 Ram Phal .......Petitioner Vs.

Radhe Shyam ........Respondent

Present:

Mr. Munfaid Khan, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) The counsel for the petitioner submits that cause of action in the revision petition does not survive for consideration, in view of the fact that the suit itself has been disposed of and thus, seeks liberty of this Court to withdraw the revision petition.

The revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE July 15, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.07.18 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document