Sonu Alias Sonu Bansal v. Ram Kali & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CR No.8690 of 2015 (O&M) Date of decision:25.01.2016 Sonu alias Sonu Bansal ... Petitioner Vs.

Ramkali alias Poonam and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw present petition as defendants No.1 and 2 in reply to the application seeking directions for giving specimen signatures has admitted the signatures on the written statement and his client would get available comparison from specimen signatures on the written statement from the agreement to sell.

In view of the aforementioned prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present revision petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to undertake the exercise as mentioned.

Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE January 25, 2016 savita SAVITA DEVI KADIAN 2016.01.27 12:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh