Nirmala Rani And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others





IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-901-2024 Date of decision : 31.01.2024 NIRMALA RANI AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present :

Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioners are seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondents No.4 to 8.

Notice of motion.

Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.

As per the petitioners, they have married on 27.01.2024 against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 8, who happen to be the family members/ relatives of petitioner No.1 i.e. Nirmala Rani. Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that petitioner No.1-Nirmala Rani is 27.05.2005 born and petitioner No.2-Kuldeep Singh is 18.11.2000 born.

Deepak Kumar 2024.01.31 19:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-901-2024 -22024:PHHC:012746 Without commenting on the legality and validity of the marriage, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 (Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur) to look into the representation dated 29.01.2024 (Annexure P-5) submitted by the petitioners. Keeping in view the fact that both the petitioners claim to have married, I think that if possible, respondent No.2 may call a meeting of the petitioners as well as respondents No.4 to 8 in his presence, so that the parties get rid off their ill feelings and live amicably. The petition stands disposed off.

January 31, 2024 (Pankaj Jain) Dpr Judge Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Deepak Kumar 2024.01.31 19:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document