← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/8322/2017dismissed

Malti Devi And ORS v. Sham Lal

2018-01-09Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CR No. 8322 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 8322 of 2017 Date of Decision: 09.01.2018 Malti Devi and others

...Petitioners

VERSUS

Sham Lal

...Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate for the petitioners.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition with prayer that petitioners be allowed reasonable time for vacating and handing over the possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlord.

In view of request made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Request of learned counsel for petitioners for grant of reasonable time to petitioners to vacate the premises is allowed and the revision petitioners are granted six months' time to vacate and hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlord, subject to the following terms:- (i) The petitioners-tenant will pay/deposit the entire due rent upto 31st January 2018 within two weeks.

(ii) They will keep on paying/depositing the advance rent/mesne profits of subsequent months upto 30.06.2018 on or before 7th day of each month.

(iii) They will file affidavit before the Executing Court within three weeks giving details of entire payment of Jitender Kumar 2018.01.09 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CR No. 8322 of 2017 -2rent/mesne profits and undertaking to vacate and hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondents on or before 30.06.2018.

In case of default in compliance of any of the above terms, the respondent-landlord will be entitled to execute the order of ejectment forthwith. The order has been passed in the absence of respondent to avoid unnecessary delay and expenses.

A copy of this order be conveyed to the respondent. In the event of respondent having any objection, he may file application to that effect. On receipt of the application, the same be listed for hearing. ( SURINDER GUPTA ) January 09, 2017 JUDGE jk Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2018.01.09 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh