Jagrup Singh v. State Of Punjab Through Home Secy. Civil Sectt. Pb. And ORS.

2024:PHHC:003926

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10844-1996 Date of Decision : 12.01.2024 JAGRUP SINGH ......... PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH HOME SECY. CIVIL SECTT. PB. AND ORS.

......... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (Oral) 1.

As per office report, learned counsel for the petitioner has been informed, however, there is no representation of the petitioner. 2.

The petitioner was made regular w.e.f. 18.04.1992 and from the said date, he was considered for promotion. There were 11 vacancies and he was at Sr. No.16, thus, he was not promoted. The petitioner could not be considered for promotion prior to his date of regular appointment. 3.

In the wake of submissions of learned State counsel and considering the fact that there is no representation of the petitioner, the petition stands disposed of. The petitioner is at liberty to move an appropriate application, if something survives. ( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) 12.01.2024 JUDGE anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Anju Goel 2024.01.12 14:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh