Jaswinder Kaur v. State Of Punjab And Another

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh .....

Criminal Misc. No.M-4470 of 2019 Date of decision:11.02.2019 Jaswinder Kaur

...Petitioner

v.

State of Punjab and another

...Respondents

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. G.S. Madaan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Monika Jalota, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State.

Mr. R.S. Bains, Advocate for the complainant. .....

Inderjit Singh, J.

The petitioner has filed this second petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.192 dated 6.9.2017 registered for the offence under Sections 306 read with Section 34 IPC at Police Station City Kharar, District S.A.S. Nagar. Notice of motion was issued in this case.

Ms. Monika Jalota, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab has appeared on behalf of the respondent-State and Mr. R.S. Bains, learned Advocate has appeared for the complainant and contested this petition. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record.

HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2019.02.13 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-4470 of 2019 [2] A perusal of the record shows that this second petition for anticipatory bail has already been dismissed by this Court vide order dated 15.12.2017 on merit. As per the earlier order, the present petitioner is named in the FIR as well as in the suicide note and there are serious allegations against her.

Today, learned counsel for the petitioner argued that cancellation report has been filed against the petitioner by the Police. On the other hand, learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant contested this argument and stated that challan has already been presented against other persons and it has been mentioned in the challan that the present petitioner could not be arrested. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, I find that there are no new facts for grant of anticipatory bail to the present petitioner.

Therefore, finding no merit in this petition, the same is dismissed.

February 11, 2019.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2019.02.13 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh