Pargat Singh v. Jit Singh And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.971 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision.09.02.2016 Pargat Singh .......Petitioner Vs.

Jit Singh and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Vijay Rana, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The issues are framed on the basis of pleadings and not vicea-versa. If there is an issue framed by the trial Court whether the defendant had prescribed title to the property by adverse possession, there cannot a situation that the defendant should be permitted to bring a statement that he has title to the property by way of adverse possession. Ths amendment was sought after the stage of remand at the trial. The trial Court has rejected it.

2.

I will not find any reason for interference in the revision petition. The revision petition is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE February 09, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.02.10 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document