High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/8684/2014disposed of

Santosh Rani v. Narain Dass & ORS

2018-01-11Mr. Justice Arun Monga1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.8684 of 2014 Date of Decision.11.01.2018 Santosh Rani .......Petitioner Vs Narain Dass and others ........Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Punchhi, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

-.- AMIT RAWAL J.(ORAL) Mr. Punchhi, on instructions from his client, submits that the suit in which the interim order had been passed, which gave cause of action for the revision petition, has been dismissed as withdrawn. Therefore, no cause of action survives in the present revision petition. Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to revive the revision petition if the statement confronted is found incorrect.

In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 4, the revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous but with liberty as aforesaid.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE January 11, 2018 Pankaj* Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2018.01.12 11:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document