High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/8690/2014allowed

Om Parkash v. Rattan Singh & ANR

2016-04-04Mr. Justice Arun Monga1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CR No.8690 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision:04.04.2016 Om Parkash ... Petitioner Vs.

Rattan Singh and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Rajender Chhokar, Advocate for the petitioner.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) The petitioner-plaintiff is aggrieved of the dismissal of the suit on account of non-production of the evidence. Mr. Rajender Chhokar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner-plaintiff submits that in case, one effective opportunity is granted, he will conclude the evidence and other party would have a chance to rebut the same.

The respondents have been served. However, vide order dated 19.05.2015, they were proceeded against ex parte. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff and appraised the paper book and I deem it appropriate to grant one effective opportunity to the petitioner to lead the entire evidence. Accordingly, the revision petition stands allowed. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE April 04, 2016 savita SAVITA DEVI KADIAN 2016.04.06 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh