High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/6515/2021allowed

Amit Alias Kabutar v. State Of Haryana

2021-02-16Mr. Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-6515-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 16.2.2021 Amit @ Kabutar ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. R.K.Bagga, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG Haryana assisted by I.O. Naresh Kumar.

(proceedings conducted through video conferencing) ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)

1. The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in a case registered vide FIR No.255 dated 12.11.2020 under Section 394 IPC at Police Station Rajound, District Kaithal.

2. The FIR was lodged at the instance of Shamsher Singh wherein it is alleged that on 12.11.2020, he alongwith his younger brother Rishi Pal went in their car CRETA to drop the maids (domestic help) who had come to their house to prepare meals as there was a function in connection with marriage in their village. While they were returning back, two boys came on a Bullet motorcycle having registration No.HR-08AA-4480 and stopped the same in front of their car and thereafter another two boys also joined them and they took out the keys from the complainant's car and demanded money. They tried to snatch the bag which contained money and also hit them but the KAMAL KUMAR 2021.02.16 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-6515-2021 (O&M) complainant did not leave the bag. It is further alleged that one boy was being addressed as Kabutar by the other accused.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case on account of some dispute amongst the petitioner and the complainant and infact even as per FIR, no amount or the vehicle was ever snatched by the accused.

4. Opposing the petition, the learned State counsel has submitted that since the petitioner is specifically named in the FIR, no case for grant of bail is made out. It has, however, been informed that the petitioner is not involved in any other case and that challan already stands presented.

5. Having regard to the aforestated position wherein the petitioner is not stated to be involved in any other case and that the challan already stands presented, further detention of the petitioner will not serve any useful purpose.

6. The petition, as such, is accepted and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned. 16.2.2021 (Gurvinder Singh Gill) kamal Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No KAMAL KUMAR 2021.02.16 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document