Veena v. Vijender Kumar Kaushik

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.237 TA-113-2025 Date of Decision: 14.11.2025 VEENA ....Applicant

Versus

VIJENDER KUMAR KAUSHIK .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- None for the applicant.

Mr. Arihant Goyal, Advocate for the respondent. ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) There is no representation on behalf of the applicant. At this stage, counsel for the respondent submits that the applicant was proceeded against ex parte in the divorce petition, pending before learned trial Court, which was sought to be transferred and the ex parte proceedings decree has been passed by the court on 06.11.2025, copy of the judgment has been supplied by the counsel, which is taken on record. In view of the submissions made by the counsel for the respondent and also considering the copy of the judgment placed on record, the present application is hereby dismissed, as having become infructuous. (ARCHANA PURI) 14.11.2025 JUDGE Sonu Saini Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No Sonu 2025.11.18 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document