Anvinash Kumar Jha v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 07.04.2022 ANVINASH KUMAR JHA
STATE OF HARYANA ...
!!!!
"
# $
% &% & '( )*+*,-.*-/0 .*- (12,,3 ( "% *--- /*-34*-..,5.5/(16% 7% 1 & 1
8/5-0*-*/% %
% & % %% % &
" % %
& %
'( %% 1 % % &9 (
:&
; 6% &9 <8
1 72 &
1
% %% &9 2 %
-2-
% &
% & (
1 (
(% &9
% $ ( % < $ %%
& % &9 ; %
&
% % & 9 1 /--,*-/0
5++--<3&%%
&
% * /-
& 3
% ;$ % &
% &%& 1 /=-0*-*-*5-**-*- %
&
&%& % >
(
& % % &
& $
% % &%$ %& % (
% >
& ?&% 1 > 1 14( *-// 6.7 61 %7 =0= @ % *+*0 > 3
-3- !
!
" # $ !
!
%&
!! !
%
!# ! %&
!
%
! %
%
# !
%'
!
% !
"
!
(
%
) "
*%+%" ,&-./01".0/
(
%'
%
!2
% 34
!
, .
% 5!
!
-4-
% %"
! %
!
! %& (
%6
" # !
%4
!
% " 7
+%- 89..."01: ;.% &
!
%*
!
!!
!<&, .
<*
!
!
%&
! 33 ! !
= !
%,
! >%?
> @ ,
'
%; 0& A' B" @
#
-5-
#
!% 14
%4
!( C ! !%,
!
!
! "
D '&6 > % ! !
%4
!
# !'&% /& ! !
%4
! # !
%E Per contra, while opposing the prayer for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, learned State counsel does not dispute the custody period of the petitioner. He, however, submits that the petitioner along with co-accused, namely, Neeraj Kumar Gupta, had conspired with each other and used the name of Policybazaar for defrauding the clients of Policybazaar; that forged call centre, forged documents and fake mobile numbers were being used to make calls to the general public and thus, many people have been duped of their hard earned money, making them believe that they had been investing in the Insurance Policies. He further submits that there are total 83 prosecution witnesses, out of whom only
-6one has been examined, thus far.
I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has been in custody since 10.06.2019. Offences are triable by the Magistrate. Co-accused have already been enlarged on bail. Most of the prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined. In such circumstances, the trial of the case would take a long time to conclude. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars.
In view of the above and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, lest it should prejudice the case of both the sides, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two solvent sureties of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned. The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement to any person acquainted with the facts of the case; the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date before the learned Court concerned and can only remain absent with the prior permission of such Court. However, it is made clear that, in case the petitioner violates the terms and conditions of this order, the State would be at liberty to move an appropriate application for modification/recalling of this order.
A 4
F
GF6 4
GF6