Surjit Kaur v. Shubeg Singh & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.8775 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision.10.01.2019 Surjit Kaur

...Petitioner

Vs Shubeg Singh and another

...Respondents

2.

C.R. No.8882 of 2017 Surjit Kaur

...Petitioner

Vs Balbir Singh

...Respondent

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Nagar Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikasdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Baljeet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate for the respondent.

-.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the revision petitions against the interim orders passed in pending suits have become infructuous, as the main suits itself have been decided. In view of the statement made by the counsel for the respondent, the revision petitions are dismissed as having become infrcutuous. However, liberty is granted to the counsel for the petitioner to revive the petitions in case the statement is found to be incorrect.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE January 10, 2019 Pankaj* Whether Reasoned/Speaking No Whether Reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.01.15 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document