(O&M) Pritam Kaur v. Didar Singh And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-12175-1995 Date of decision: - 11.09.2018 Pritam Kaur

...Petitioner

Versus

Didar Singh and others

...Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU Present:- None.

**** MAHESH GROVER , J.

(ORAL) We notice in the previous order that counsel for the petitioner has expired and thereafter notice was issued to the petitioner. As per office report, notice issued to the petitioner has been received back with the report that the petitioner has expired. Since neither any application has been moved to bring their legal representatives on record; nor is there any information forthcoming about any surviving interest in the petition, we deem it appropriate to dismiss the present petition for non-prosecution. In case any application for revival of the present petition is moved by LRs of the petitioner at some stage to show that something survives therein, the prayer for the same shall be considered. ( MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE ( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU) September 11, 2018 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reportable?

No Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes NARESH KUMAR 2018.09.15 13:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh