Daljeet Kaur v. State Of Punjab And ORS




    
        

  ! """    CRM-M- 6247-2021 DALJEET KAUR       # 
 STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

$    %"&   CRM-M- 12861-2021  '
( 
'
)* +*   ,  #       
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

$   (   -*(  '
+
 '  . 



  


for the petitioners in CRM-M-6247-2021.

Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-12861-2021.


  



 







 for respondent No.2 in CRM-M-6247-2021 and CRM-M-12861-2021.

!!!!!
+
 '  .  % #/&  "
#

$$
 



% 
 '$

(



$

  
%

 

%




$
%




 $
)*



-2- +
,
$ 

%




-
  
 

./+
&

-
&
-


  
"012
3 

& 
 &  


4--56



7 
&


8


&
)*
9
::.;
 
:0:<+:"1
  
 

.+:
 "+:'
&

*
 
- 
"/;:
 

 

 




=

)> 7
3

?
'"6
 

  


8


% 




  &$
 


&
$%$

@&& 

 
+/"++:+:
3

?
'+6

 



2
#
%

( 
   
%% 
 &

 
- @* 8



 
 
 
:.:.+:++
 
+2:<+:++
% 

 ,
&

-
%

-'';+.1'+:+"

 

  
 



$%$

  

 %



 %

 
(
 
&
.

 



 
 %


   
&$
A 



)

- 



 
 $
9
.2;
 "<:;+:++
#
 

?

 
 %

 % 

   '

 

 

    

 



   !

     "  

   # $%   & '

  ( &

 

  



& % &&!

) &

!!





!

!

&& 



  (    &

  

    

    ) !

 

  

  ( %  %  & 

 

   !

 

-3- !  *

%   !!



 )  +&

 

!   && !





   ) %      ! ! &  & !

( %   &

  

      

 & % &&!



   %!  

    

  

  )    

  & !  *

%  ) 

     &  

 ! & 



&  ! 

 

    !   ( %   &

  

   !!

     &'

   

& 

+ & !  

  !   <

B  






% 
& $
&
$%$

$




 ,





  




%
$

 ;
B  


&






  


)*
 


  


8


% 




8  

1

#
)

&

-


$


&






     

      
 % 
     

 

!

""

 #

$%

 
  

  

,"-.!!

)!&    

 ! 

   &!  !

!  !



  

+ / !  

 !0-"& 

+(1(+(.

!  !  

  !



!



! &)( ()

-42   &

!

&+22 ! 

 & !

2( "3  & '

(

  '

& '

 

   ) '* *,     ) 4(  



  

 !

 & !     

 &  5
.

&  & !

% 

 )

 &) 

!

  %   & &  & (6 78.

  !   !



%   !

&

 ! !

  

(  !



  

  !

      %    ) /!

  

 !   !!  !) 

   &  !

 

 +   &  ) / ! & !

     &  

   

  % 

    

! &! !

 

  & !

79

) 

  & !7"83&

+(1(+()

!

!

)!  

 

 !0-"&

+(1(+( 7".

!   )

! )

 :  &     



%(   

  &

!

 &

 

 !0-"&

+(1(+( 

   !

 !

  !     !

)  )

 !



!  

!

&!)

 2&  & !

2(  !

% 

    

 

! )   ; 

 ) !

!! 

!

 !& 

  

 +  / !   



!0-"&

+(1(+(

&!   )          

     

  !

 ! (

-5- .

  !     !

       !  

/ !  & !

  )  !  

   !

 &  

& ! 

!   !



!  & !

     

 !  &  ( 77 .

   %   !! &  

  %

! 

  



+(1(+( !

 ! && ! 

 

    &   + 



! 0-"( 

) 

 

 !   

 

 !   

+ 



   :  

 !

   ;!    && !

    

  

 ! 7"8& 

+(1(+()

 

  &  ! 

 & !

70 .

 

 ! 0-" & 

 +(1(+(  

/ !

</; 4   &!

 & +( .

  !  

   / %    

&

 ;

       *  +  %  

/ ! 

  (

  

&!   !! !

 & !

 ! ( .

   



!0-"&

+(1(+(  (* )

* +  / !          !   !( .

/ !  &       !!  !    ( .

 +   %   

/;  && !% 

  ! !

(.

+ &  !

!

 % !

)   ;!  ! ( &   &!  



   ) 

 & )    ! 



        &  +  !

  



%  %  & && !  

 

   !

-6- !         & !  & 

!    % ( /

#

%


 
(
&
8


&

$

( 
 
%% 
,

C D
% $
-


$


&
'Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and another,(2012)10 SCC303'. Still further, the broad principles for exercising the powers under Section 482 were summarized by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of 'Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others versus State of Gujarat and another" (2017) 9 SCC 641'. 9.

*





 (
&

$ 
  


$


%



 &
%%
( 

 
,





% 


#
&   
&

% 

7 ,



(

 

$
  
%%  


  


":


#
C D
% $
-

 


$


&
D"# + , , -

  &    *



)

 .!/0
 
$

( 


  > 

%  





$



( 

&





? 


 %

,

$$

&

&& 
&


 


8


&
( 
( 
  
% 



-
 8 

)*

 (
&

  

$


#
 


C D
% $
-

?

 

   '

19. We thus sum-up and hold that as opposed to Section 320 Cr.P.C. where the Court is squarely guided by the compromise between the parties in respect of offences

-7- 'compoundable' within the statutory framework, the extraordinary power enjoined upon a High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or vested in this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution, can be invoked beyond the metes and bounds of Section 320 Cr.P.C. Nonetheless, we reiterate that such powers of wide amplitude ought to be exercised carefully in the context of quashing criminal proceedings, bearing in mind: (i) Nature and effect of the offence on the conscious of the society; (ii) Seriousness of the injury, if any; (iii) Voluntary nature of compromise between the accused and the victim; & (iv) Conduct of the accused persons, prior to and after the occurrence of the purported offence and/or other relevant considerations.

""

#
& (


 

& 
$ 
&$
%  
&


(
  8

  %$

%% $




&




%( 
  
 

./+
-- '

6
#


$

,


%






&

$ ,




 
% ?


$% 



6
#
%


3

 


6







 

 


%

7 ,

  
 % 



%




&

 
 

(



(7
%  

6
# 







 
)*
(  

 


, 
+:"1








iv)
#
&& 

8










 && 

( 

7







&

-8-



,

% 

 
*
 


$ 



7







&

- v)
-




% 

 
&



%


  
 
&



% 

7 ,

'


 ,

% 

vi)
#
% 


7 ,


&

,
&
(

%


%% 
 
% 



9
 
% 
%%
( 

 
,





% 

F
viii)



&& 
 ,





 




  

,









% ,
&




& 
 




)* ix)
#
$% 

7 ,

%% 
 % 


-




% 

7 ,



(

 

$ 
#

&
(

(
 
(

  

 &&  
 
%  & ,
' ?



$ , 12.

In view of the report of the A 



)

- 




CRM-M-6247-2021
a 
%

 
(
,

% ?
-

1



-'

      

 !!

(

"# + , , -

  &   

 )

 .!/
 
 
,

)

&

-





    -'

      *

 !

""

 #

$% 

%


 ( 
#
&

-9FIR No. 0046 dated 09.05.2017, under Sections 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Sadar Abohar, District Fazilka (Annexure P-1) and all other consequential proceedings arising there from
# 0#12 340 8

%

 (
&
compromise/affidavit dated 28.12.2020 (Annexure P-2) However, the same would be subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/- to be deposited by the each petitioner with the "District Legal Service Authority, Fazilka" within one month from receipt of certified copy of this order. 


 (        %+
 '  .&
  ' 5"""        =   





G  
% 7

@    H @9






G  
 % 





H @9