Raj Kumar And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ORS

CWP-2046-2024 2024:PHHC:014012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-2046-2024 Date of Decision: 01.02.2024 Raj Kumar and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Mr.Dhiraj Jindal, Advocate for Mr. Nitesh Singla, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking directions to the official respondents to extend benefit of step up of pay in terms of letter dated 22.08.2019 (Annexure P-7) and order dated 17.09.2020 (Annexure P-10) passed by respondents pursuant to order dated 19.06.2020 (Annexure P-9) passed by this Court.

2.

Learned State counsel, who on advance notice is present in Court, fairly submits that the petition may be disposed of in the light of directions issued by this Court vide order dated 19.06.2020 (Annexure P-9) in CWP No.8290 of 2020, Sukhwinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others. He further submits that case of the petitioners would be Anju Goel 2024.02.01 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-2046-2024 2024:PHHC:014012 considered in the light of order dated 17.09.2020 (Annexure P-10) passed by the department.

3.

In the wake of statement of learned State counsel, the present petition stands disposed of.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 01.02.2024 anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Anju Goel 2024.02.01 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh