M/S Karta Ram Mohinder Pal Commission Agent And ANR v. Satpal @ Satta
YOGESH SHARMA 2018.12.20 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-8947-2017 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CR-8947-2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.12.2018 M/s Karta Ram Mohinder Pal Commission Agent and another ... Petitioners
Versus
Satpal @ Satta ... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:
Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Dalal, Advocate for the respondent.
**** AMIT RAWAL, J.
Concededly the suit is at the stage of defence evidence, when the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC, at the instance of the petitioner-defendant was filed. No doubt the application can be moved at any stage of the suit, but it is too late in a day to adjudicate upon the application. The defendant shall complete the evidence as early possible, so that, the suit reaches at the final stage of arguments. With the aforesaid observations, the impugned order is upheld and the present revision petition stands disposed of. 18.12.2018 Yogesh Sharma ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No