Smt Rajkali v. Chandigarh Housing Board And Others

CWP-2168-2026 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-2168-2026 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 12.02.2026 SMT RAJKALI ... Petitioner

Versus

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD AND OTHERS ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

Present:

Mr. Balam Singh, Advocate and Mr. Kripal singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gagandeep Singh Wasu, Senior Standing Counsel for respondent-Chandigarh Housing Board.

**** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) CM-2130-CWP-2026 This application is for preponement of the date of hearing. Issue notice in the application to the respondents. Mr. Gagandeep Singh Wasu, Senior Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent-Chandigarh Housing Board. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the date of hearing in the main case is preponed and it is taken up for hearing today itself. CWP-2168-2026 The petitioner has challenged the orders cancelling the allotment of small flat and directing eviction.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had been KUMARI SAPNA 2026.02.13 10.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-2168-2026 (O&M) allotted a flat under the Chandigarh Small Flats-Scheme, 2006. He had been paying the rent/licence fee but later due to financial difficulty he could not make the payment. He submits that the petitioner has paid the entire outstanding amount of Rs.2,00,000/- and therefore, the order cancelling allotment be revoked. 3.

Learned counsel for the respondent-Chandigarh Housing Board submits that although the petitioner had paid a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- but an amount of Rs.8802/- as on 29.01.2026 is still outstanding. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would pay the afore-noted amount within a period of 02 days from now. 5.

In view of the above, especially when the petitioner has paid almost the entire amount, it would be in the interest of justice, if the order cancelling the allotment is revoked. Consequently, the petition is allowed and the order cancelling the allotment of the flat and directing eviction shall stand revoked subject to the petitioner depositing the outstanding amount of Rs.8802/- within a period of two weeks. The petitioner would henceforth pay the lease money regularly and in the event of any default, the respondents would be at liberty to take action in accordance with law.

6.

All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 12.02.2026 sapna Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No KUMARI SAPNA 2026.02.13 10.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document