Kulwant Rai v. Land Acquisition Collector Cum Sub Divisional Magistrate And ORS

CR No.9016 of 2017 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CR No.9016 of 2017 Date of decision:22.11.2018 Kulwant Rai ... Petitioner Vs.

Land Acquisition Collector-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. C.M.Munjal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Amit Jain, Advocate for respondent no.2.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) The present revision petition is directed against the impugned order dated 04.09.2017 (Annexure P-7), whereby, the execution application was adjourned sine die as the dispute with regard to allotment in favour of the petitioner being a sitting tenant at the behest of big landlord was pending adjudication before this Court in CWP No.13733 of 1998 which stands admitted.

It is also not in dispute that amount of compensation determined lying deposited. The apportionment of share cannot be determined in the absence of decision, therefore, the impugned order adjourning the execution application sine die cannot be faulted with. SAVITA KADIAN 2018.11.29 12:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CR No.9016 of 2017 {2} However, since the amount is lying deposited, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the petition by issuing a direction to the trial Court to deposit the amount in FDRs so that the amount would incur the interest. The revision petition stands disposed of.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE November 22, 2018 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2018.11.29 12:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh