Sunil Kumar Dhiman v. Principal, Govt Polytechnic, Mandi Adampur Etc.

FAO-2040-2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH FAO-2040-2002 Date of Decision:-16.03.2026 Sunil Kumar Dhiman ......Appellant

Versus

Principal, Govt. Polytechnic, Mandi Adampur and ors. ...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ****

Present:

None for the appellant.

Mr. Ajit Kumar Sharma, DAG, Haryana for respondent No.1-State.

Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate, with Ms. Chahat, Advocate, & Mr. Anmol Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. Alankrit Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.3/Insurance Company.

**** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL , J. (Oral) 1.

On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the appellant had appeared and submitted that he was not in touch with the appellant and had no instructions in the matter. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.

2.

In view of the above, and considering the fact that the present appeal pertains to the year 2002, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the matter pending. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, with liberty to the appellant to seek revival of the same, if so advised, as per law.

FAO-2040-2002 3.

Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 16.03.2026 anil Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No